Comments on: Hackwell’s Cloak of Privacy http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/ Fraudbuster Bob, fighting a never-ending battle for truth, electoral justice, and the American way. Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:18:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dave Kovacs http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-123 Dave Kovacs Thu, 04 May 2006 06:24:32 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-123 In the interest of prudence, perhaps we should use his real name: Blackwell. To call him "Hackwell" is, in the first place, juvenile. It reminds me a joke from a fifth grader. To repeat it ad nauseum reminds me of too many people who lack skill in humor or rhetoric. At the end of the day, I am interested in logic. All red herrings, rhetorical tricks, and fallacies only serve to annoy me. DKK In the interest of prudence, perhaps we should use his real name: Blackwell.

To call him “Hackwell” is, in the first place, juvenile. It reminds me a joke from a fifth grader. To repeat it ad nauseum reminds me of too many people who lack skill in humor or rhetoric.

At the end of the day, I am interested in logic. All red herrings, rhetorical tricks, and fallacies only serve to annoy me.

DKK

]]> By: dael4 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-117 dael4 Wed, 03 May 2006 17:09:28 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-117 With time to reflect.... who was it that said, .... "in order to win you must respect your opponent?" With time to reflect….

who was it that said, …. “in order to win you must respect your opponent?”

]]> By: dael4 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-116 dael4 Wed, 03 May 2006 16:26:31 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-116 I have great respect for the Green Party Dave but is there anything professional about stealing elections and putting Bush in the whitehouse who sent the US to war where 100,000+ people are killed. That is professional? A president who can't pronounce nuclear right? Does it really matter? I understand your concern but respect here is NOT deserved. I have great respect for the Green Party Dave but is there anything professional about stealing elections and putting Bush in the whitehouse who sent the US to war where 100,000+ people are killed. That is professional?

A president who can’t pronounce nuclear right? Does it really matter?
I understand your concern but respect here is NOT deserved.

]]> By: dael4 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-115 dael4 Wed, 03 May 2006 16:00:20 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-115 With the mandatory paper trail is it possible to just do a recount regardless of how close or far the election was? And who ran the poll prior to election saying Blackwell was ahead? It all looks like it was all set up to me. May God save us... Watch the enlighning video of Hackwell in the of the PBS program NOW via Bradblog by clicking link below http://tinyurl.com/qgmfr With the mandatory paper trail is it possible to just do a recount regardless of how close or far the election was?

And who ran the poll prior to election saying Blackwell was ahead?
It all looks like it was all set up to me.

May God save us…
Watch the enlighning video of Hackwell in the of the PBS program NOW via Bradblog by clicking link below

http://tinyurl.com/qgmfr

]]> By: Dave Kovacs http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-114 Dave Kovacs Wed, 03 May 2006 15:58:03 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-114 In the interest of professionalism, wouldn't it be useful to use the candidate's actual name (ie. Blackwell)? It would make things considerably less annoying for voters who are considering our Green campaign. DKK In the interest of professionalism, wouldn’t it be useful to use the candidate’s actual name (ie. Blackwell)?

It would make things considerably less annoying for voters who are considering our Green campaign.

DKK

]]> By: 48thRonin http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-113 48thRonin Wed, 03 May 2006 11:57:35 +0000 http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/05/03/hackwells-cloak-of-privacy/#comment-113 Hackwell has won the GOP nod. The Washington Post notes, with no irony, that, "Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell won the GOP nomination for governor after portraying himself as the best candidate to deliver his party from a year of political scandals and infighting." Omigawd! Do we ever need Fraudbuster Bob now! Hackwell has won the GOP nod. The Washington Post notes, with no irony, that, “Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell won the GOP nomination for governor after portraying himself as the best candidate to deliver his party from a year of political scandals and infighting.”

Omigawd! Do we ever need Fraudbuster Bob now!

]]>