<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diebold, Electronic Voting And The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2008/11/07/diebold-electronic-voting-and-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2008/11/07/diebold-electronic-voting-and-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy/</link>
	<description>Fraudbuster Bob, fighting a never-ending battle for truth, electoral justice, and the American way.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dael4</title>
		<link>http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2008/11/07/diebold-electronic-voting-and-the-vast-right-wing-conspiracy/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>dael4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/?p=501#comment-432</guid>
		<description>http://usacoup.scoop.co.nz/?p=966 

Michael Collins

(Wash. DC) In 2004, we were told to anticipate a red versus blue election. It didn’t turn out that way but that was hardly mentioned.

By 2008, we were told to expect record voter turnout for the presidential election. Now we’re told that the predictions were wrong, the pictures of long lines, massive early voting, and massive registration increases all went to produce just about the same vote total as reported for 2004.

The 2004 vote total was 122 million compared to 105 million in 2000. We’re left with this question. With all the excitement and effort plus a huge funding advantage for Obama, how is it that the voters going to the polls were about equal in number for 2004 and 2008?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://usacoup.scoop.co.nz/?p=966" rel="nofollow">http://usacoup.scoop.co.nz/?p=966</a> </p>
<p>Michael Collins</p>
<p>(Wash. DC) In 2004, we were told to anticipate a red versus blue election. It didn’t turn out that way but that was hardly mentioned.</p>
<p>By 2008, we were told to expect record voter turnout for the presidential election. Now we’re told that the predictions were wrong, the pictures of long lines, massive early voting, and massive registration increases all went to produce just about the same vote total as reported for 2004.</p>
<p>The 2004 vote total was 122 million compared to 105 million in 2000. We’re left with this question. With all the excitement and effort plus a huge funding advantage for Obama, how is it that the voters going to the polls were about equal in number for 2004 and 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
